Philip Henning vs Maik Steiner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Henning vs M. Steiner

Philip Henning
RSA
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
31
-
Height
-
363
C. Rank
765
324
Best Rank
656
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Maik Steiner
GER
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
31
-
Height
-
363
C. Rank
765
324
Best Rank
656
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Henning 1 - 0 Steiner
They have played 3 sets in total, with Philip Henning winning 2 and Maik Steiner winning 1. The last match between Philip Henning and Maik Steiner was at the M25 Addis Ababa, 24-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Philip Henning getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Henning | 1 |
| Steiner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Addis Ababa(05-24-24)
Philip Henning
6
3
6
Maik Steiner
3
6
3
P. Henning vs M. Steiner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 75.63% (121-39) | Career Total W/L | 57.26% (213-159) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Henning vs M. Steiner Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Philip Henning has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Maik Steiner has won 43.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Philip Henning, in recent form, has won 46.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maik Steiner has won 46.30%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.83% and 29.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Philip Henning has saved 50.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maik Steiner has saved 54.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Philip Henning has won 75.41% of matches played (W/L 46/15), with Maik Steiner winning 41.67% (W/L 20/28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Philip Henning has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 80% (W/L 100/25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 9/7). Maik Steiner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 124/87), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Philip Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 36/6), where as Maik Steiner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.24% of matches (W/L 16/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Philip Henning winning 1 times and Maik Steiner being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Philip Henning winning 2 and Maik Steiner winning 1.
- The last match between Philip Henning and Maik Steiner was at the M25 Addis Ababa, 24-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Philip Henning getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Philip Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 372.92 while Maik Steiner has played against players with an average rank of 448.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Philip Henning has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maik Steiner has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Philip Henning has converted 32.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maik Steiner has converted 38.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Philip Henning vs Maik Steiner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Henning vs M. Steiner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:59:0 | Average Match Time | 1:59:0 |
| 73% (61/84) | 1st Serve % | 67% (56/84) |
| 79% (48/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (41/56) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 20% (2/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 35% (29/84) | Return Points Win % | 30% (25/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Henning 54%, Steiner 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Henning 55%, Steiner 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Henning 63%, Steiner 56%.
P. Henning Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
M. Steiner Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||

P. Henning vs M. Steiner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.63% (121/39) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.26% (213/159) |
| 71.47% (258/103) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.46% (485/359) |
| 58.84% (1931/1351) | Games Win/Loss | 53.95% (4347/3710) |
| 80.00% (100/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.34% (82/61) |
| 63.16% (12/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.77% (124/87) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 464 | Aces Total | 833 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 186 | Total Double Faults | 603 |
| 1:31:4 | Average Match Time | 1:9:47 |
| 412.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.13 |
| 66% (5988/9112) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10110/16676) |
| 71% (4263/5988) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6832/10110) |
| 57% (1766/3124) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3327/6566) |
| 46% (520/1125) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (725/1681) |
| 43% (4262/9897) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6737/16791) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 83.72% (108/21) | Futures W/L | 58.10% (208/150) |
| 76% (121/160) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (212/371) |
| 58% (25/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (47/90) |
| 61% (25/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (41/101) |
| 94% (114/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (221/196) |
| 6% (114/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (221/25) |
| 30% (46/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (151/17) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 19/11/25
Prediction01:45 AM 19/11/25
Prediction10:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 19/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0